Robotic process automation adoption has grown exponentially over the recent years. The implementation of RPA in industries is changing the business processes in a better way. However, the bigger question is up to what extent RPA adoption is safe.

RPA –The Background

The impact of RPA has been significant in promoting organizational growth. On several business fronts, be it quality, control, economic value, decision making, or workforce benefits, the contribution of RPA has been appreciable across different departments in the company. 

Therefore, the importance of RPA in boosting operational efficiency cannot be ignored. It is transforming the way machines and humans interact to achieve better outcomes. 

The technology empowers business units in an enterprise to customize solutions rapidly to implement the digitization of processes. In addition, it helps deliver a significant value in a shorter time duration in a sustainable manner. This results in bringing down the overall risk associated with the business processes. Employees get the means to simplify their jobs and divert their attention towards higher-value tasks. 

However, it is worth noting that failing to implement RPA in the right and strategic manner can translate into elevating business complexities. Thus, it is critical to learn how to adapt and scale RPA in a standardized way so that it translates into a winning proposition while providing you a competitive differentiation.

How safe is RPA? 

RPA is a non-invasive technology that poses no hindrance or interference with your company’s existing systems. Plus, analytics ensures consistency and better decision-making. As such, RPA is a safe bet for your enterprise. But there is another side too, about which only a few people talk about.

The track record of RPA is full of positive outcomes and efficiency improvement. But sometimes RPA may also fail to produce outcomes as expected. Even it may not be appropriate for some enterprises.

The biggest downside of RPA is job losses. With the adoption of robotic automation, a large number of employees will be left jobless. As robots will replace human employees the need for the enterprise to hire human staff will fall massively. This job loss fear will make employees susceptible to RPA adoption. They will exhibit resistance and it will become harder for the enterprise to initiate the process. Employees will develop fear with robots taking up their job. And those who work may not feel comfortable working with robots. 

Final Verdict

When gauging the safety of RPA, the right collaboration between RPA and human workers is imperative to succeed. By overcoming the existing challenges, enterprises can achieve digitization while minimizing employees’ resistance.